Psychiatr Serv 56:592-598, May 2005
© 2005 American Psychiatric Association
The Content and Clinical Utility of Psychiatric Advance Directives
Debra S. Srebnik, Ph.D.,
Lindsay T. Rutherford, M.A.,
Tracy Peto, B.A.,
Joan Russo, Ph.D.,
Ellen Zick, B.A.,
Craig Jaffe, M.D. and
Paul Holtzheimer, M.D.
OBJECTIVE: This paper provides the first systematic examination of the content and clinical utility of psychiatric advance directives, which are documents that specify treatment preferences in advance of periods of compromised decision making. METHODS: Directives were completed by 106 community mental health center outpatients with at least two psychiatric hospitalizations or emergency department visits within two years. Participants used AD-Maker software in groups of up to six people led by peer trainers. Clinical utility was defined as the degree to which instructions are clinically feasible, useful, and consistent with standards of care. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of participants were female, and 24 percent were nonwhite. Their mean±SD age was 42±9.1 years. Primary diagnoses included schizophrenia spectrum disorders (44 percent), bipolar disorders (27 percent), major depression (22 percent), and other disorders (7 percent). Eighty-one percent of participants listed preferred medications, most often antidepressants and second-generation antipsychotics, and 64 percent listed medications they would refuse, most commonly first-generation antipsychotics. Sixty-eight percent preferred hospital alternatives over hospitalization, 89 percent specified methods of deescalating crises, and 72 percent indicated that they would refuse electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Forty-six percent appointed a surrogate decision maker. Fifty-seven percent desired a directive that is irrevocable during periods of incapacity. Instructions were rated as feasible, useful, and consistent with practice standards for at least 95 percent of the advance directives, with the exception of instructions about the willingness to use medications not specifically listed in the directive. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggested that psychiatric advance directives provide a wealth of treatment preference information that is almost uniformly considered clinically useful. Although the utility of advance directives may vary depending on the circumstances of specific crisis episodes, the information provided can expedite and strengthen clinical care.
Related Article:
-
May 2005: This Month's Highlights
Psychiatr Serv 2005 56: 517.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
C. Henderson, J. W. Swanson, G. Szmukler, G. Thornicroft, and M. Zinkler
A Typology of Advance Statements in Mental Health Care
Psychiatr Serv,
January 1, 2008;
59(1):
63 - 71.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. D. Van Citters, U. Naidoo, and M. E. Foti
Using a Hypothetical Scenario to Inform Psychiatric Advance Directives
Psychiatr Serv,
November 1, 2007;
58(11):
1467 - 1471.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. Wilder, E. B. Elbogen, M. S. Swartz, J. W. Swanson, and R. A. Van Dorn
Effect of Patients' Reasons for Refusing Treatment on Implementing Psychiatric Advance Directives
Psychiatr Serv,
October 1, 2007;
58(10):
1348 - 1350.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. S. Srebnik and J. Russo
Consistency of Psychiatric Crisis Care With Advance Directive Instructions
Psychiatr Serv,
September 1, 2007;
58(9):
1157 - 1163.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. S. Srebnik and S. Y. Kim
Competency for Creation, Use, and Revocation of Psychiatric Advance Directives
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law,
December 1, 2006;
34(4):
501 - 510.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Swanson, M. S. Swartz, E. B. Elbogen, R. A. Van Dorn, J. Ferron, H. R. Wagner, B. J. McCauley, and M. Kim
Facilitated Psychiatric Advance Directives: A Randomized Trial of an Intervention to Foster Advance Treatment Planning Among Persons with Severe Mental Illness
Am J Psychiatry,
November 1, 2006;
163(11):
1943 - 1951.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. S. Appelbaum
Commentary: Psychiatric Advance Directives at a Crossroads--When Can PADs be Overridden?
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law,
September 1, 2006;
34(3):
395 - 397.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Levin
Psychiatrists Often Reluctant To Encourage PADs
Psychiatr News,
July 15, 2005;
40(14):
17 - 29.
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Varma
Advance Directives for Persons With Serious Mental Illness
Psychiatr Serv,
July 1, 2005;
56(7):
874 - 875.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
Get information about faster international access.
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|
