Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychiatr Serv 57:1493-1496, October 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.10.1493
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Corrigan, P. W.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Corrigan, P. W.
Related Collections
* Patient Satisfaction, Quality of Life
* Psychotherapies (General)
* Recovery
*Related Article

Brief Report

Impact of Consumer-Operated Services on Empowerment and Recovery of People With Psychiatric Disabilities

Patrick W. Corrigan, Psy.D.

OBJECTIVE: Although the professional literature is replete with descriptions of consumer-operated services, empirical examination of these services has been relatively limited. In this study, the cross-sectional relationship between participation in consumer-operated services and measures of recovery and empowerment is examined. METHODS: A total of 1,824 people with psychiatric disability indicated whether they had participated in a peer support program (the proxy of consumer-operated services) during the past four months. They also were administered two five-factor measures of recovery and of empowerment. RESULTS: Participation in peer support was associated with nine of ten factors generated by the recovery and empowerment instruments. These associations remained significant when commensurate demographic variables were controlled for. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in peer support showed a significant association with multiple outcome and recovery subscales, but the magnitude of the effect was small. The associative nature of the data precludes stating that peer support caused the observed improvement.


Related Article:

October 2006: This Month's Highlight
Psychiatr Serv 2006 57: 1369. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
S. Barbic, T. Krupa, and I. Armstrong
A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of a Modified Recovery Workbook Program: Preliminary Findings
Psychiatr Serv, April 1, 2009; 60(4): 491 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org