Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychiatr Serv 59:209-211, February 2008
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.59.2.209
© 2008 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Veltkamp, E.
* Articles by Bowers, L.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Veltkamp, E.
* Articles by Bowers, L.
Related Collections
* Cross-Cultural Psychiatry
* Patient Satisfaction, Quality of Life
* Crisis and Emergency Treatment
*Related Articles

Brief Report

Patients' Preferences for Seclusion or Forced Medication in Acute Psychiatric Emergency in the Netherlands

Eline Veltkamp, M.Sc., Henk Nijman, Ph.D., Joost J. Stolker, M.D., Ph.D., Katja Frigge, Pieter Dries, M.D. and Len Bowers, Ph.D.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined patients' preferences for coercive measures in case of emergency situations on acute psychiatric wards. METHODS: From November 2004 until January 2006, 104 adult patients completed a questionnaire after they underwent seclusion, nonconsensual medication, or both on one of three acute psychiatric wards in the Netherlands. RESULTS: Equal numbers of patients preferred seclusion and medication, and both measures were equal in perceived aversiveness and perceived efficacy. Men more often than women expressed a preference for seclusion. Patients who understood why the measure was necessary and acquiesced to it retrospectively held more positive views of the efficacy of the measure. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients on acute psychiatric wards have a clear preference between seclusion and medication. Patients appreciated receiving explanations of the reasons for the use of a restrictive measure and discussing their preferences with staff.


Related Articles:

February 2008: This Month's Highlights
Psychiatr Serv 2008 59: 137. [Full Text] [PDF]

Regulatory Change: A Pathway to Eliminating Seclusion and Restraint or "Regulatory Scotoma"?
Janice LeBel
Psychiatr Serv 2008 59: 194-196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Commentary: Reducing Restraint and Seclusion: A View From the Trenches
Steven S. Sharfstein
Psychiatr Serv 2008 59: 197. [Full Text] [PDF]

Commentary: Commentary on the "Choice" Between Seclusion and Forced Medication
Robert Bernstein
Psychiatr Serv 2008 59: 212. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
R. Bernstein
Commentary: Commentary on the "Choice" Between Seclusion and Forced Medication
Psychiatr Serv, February 1, 2008; 59(2): 212 - 212.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2008 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org