Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychiatr Serv 59:537-539, May 2008
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.59.5.537
© 2008 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
* Articles by Duckworth, K.
* Articles by Fitzpatrick, M. J.
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Duckworth, K.
* Articles by Fitzpatrick, M. J.
Related Collections
* Patient Advocacy
* Treatment Compliance
* Health Policy and Legislation
* Quality of Care, Practice Guidelines
* Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders
* Atypical Neuroleptics
*Related Articles

Special Section on Implications of CATIE

NAMI Perspective on CATIE: Policy and Research Implications

Kenneth Duckworth, M.D. and Michael J. Fitzpatrick, M.S.W.

The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) was designed to assess effectiveness of antipsychotic medication for people with schizophrenia. The authors, who are administrators of the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), discuss CATIE and related policy and research studies and their implications. CATIE has answered some important questions for consumers and their families and raises many more. The prevalence of medical risk factors in the population with schizophrenia is an important part of advancing prevention. Poor adherence to medications randomly prescribed by CATIE physicians in a blinded procedure is also a key finding and points to the need for individually tailoring medication regimens. Policy makers may be tempted to oversimplify the results of CATIE by restricting access to the costlier second-generation medications. However, doing so will hurt clinical care, and any savings to state and community mental health programs may be illusory. Policy can be constructed to focus on clinical outcomes and not merely restrict access to medications on the basis of cost. Research is urgently needed on a new generation of medications with benign side effects and greater efficacy than their predecessors for people with schizophrenia.


Related Articles:

May 2008: This Month's Highlights
Psychiatr Serv 2008 59: 475. [Full Text] [PDF]

Introduction to the CATIE Special Section
Marvin S. Swartz
Psychiatr Serv 2008 59: 497-499. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
E. F. Torrey
A Question of Disclosure
Psychiatr Serv, August 1, 2008; 59(8): 935 - 935.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
M. S. Swartz
Introduction to the CATIE Special Section
Psychiatr Serv, May 1, 2008; 59(5): 497 - 499.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2008 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org