Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental maps Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Articles by Ellis, A. R. Articles by Morrissey, J. P. PubMed Citation Articles by Ellis, A. R. Articles by Morrissey, J. P. Access to Services Staff Training Staff Issues, Staffing Related Articles

County-Level Estimates of Mental Health Professional Supply in the United States

The authors are affiliated with the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Campus Box 7590, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 (e-mail: joe_morrissey{at}unc.edu). Preliminary findings from this study were presented at a session on mental health workforce and needs assessment at the annual meeting of American Public Health Association, November 3–7, 2007, Washington, D.C.

OBJECTIVE: This study compiled national county-level data and examined the geographic distribution of providers in six mental health professions and the correlates of county-level provider supply. METHODS: Data for six groups—advanced practice psychiatric nurses, licensed professional counselors, marriage and family therapists, psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers—were compiled from licensing counts from state boards, certification counts from national credentialing organizations, and membership counts from professional associations. The geographic distribution of professionals was examined with descriptive statistics and a national choropleth map. Correlations were examined among county-level totals and between provider-to-population ratios and county characteristics. RESULTS: There were 353,398 clinically active providers in the six professions. Provider-to-population ratios varied greatly across counties, both within professions and overall. Social workers and licensed professional counselors were the largest groups; psychiatrists and advanced practice psychiatric nurses were the smallest. Professionals tended to be in urban, high-population, high-income counties. Marriage and family therapists were concentrated in California, and other mental health professionals were concentrated in the Northeast. CONCLUSIONS: Rural, low-income counties are likely candidates for interventions such as the training of local clinicians or the provision of incentives and infrastructure to facilitate clinical practice. Workforce planning and policy analysis should consider the unique combination of professions in each area. National workforce planning efforts and state licensing boards would benefit from the central collection of standardized practice information from clinically active providers in all mental health professions.

Related Articles:

Matching Patients and Providers Across the United States

Robert Freedman
Psychiatr Serv 2009 60: 1293. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. R. Konrad, A. R. Ellis, K. C. Thomas, C. E. Holzer, and J. P. Morrissey County-Level Estimates of Need for Mental Health Professionals in the United States Psychiatr Serv, October 1, 2009; 60(10): 1307 - 1314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. C. Thomas, A. R. Ellis, T. R. Konrad, C. E. Holzer, and J. P. Morrissey County-Level Estimates of Mental Health Professional Shortage in the United States Psychiatr Serv, October 1, 2009; 60(10): 1323 - 1328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2009 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us