Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychiatr Serv 60:1463-1465, November 2009
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.60.11.1463
© 2009 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
* Articles by Little, A.
* Articles by Gray, C.
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Little, A.
* Articles by Gray, C.
Related Collections
* Health Insurance
* Access to Services
* Depression
* Antidepressants
*Related Article

Special Section on the Implications of STAR*D

Impact of the STAR*D Trial From the Perspective of the Payer

Alison Little, M.D., M.P.H., Richard A. Hansen, Ph.D., Gerald Gartlehner, M.D., M.P.H. and Carrie Gray, M.B.A.

Dr. Little is affiliated with the Center for Evidence-Based Policy, Oregon Health and Science University, 2611 SW 3rd Ave., MQ 280, Portland, OR 97201 (e-mail: littleal{at}ohsu.edu). Dr. Hansen is with the Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Dr. Gartlehner is with the Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Danube University, Krems, Austria. Ms. Gray is with the Bureau of Benefits Management, State of Wisconsin Division of Health Care Access and Accountability, Madison. This commentary is part of a special section on the STAR*D trial (Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression) and the implications of its findings for practice and policy. Grayson S. Norquist, M.D., M.S.P.H., served as guest editor of the special section.

The authors discuss implications for private and public insurers of the STAR*D trial (Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression), which found evidence that for second- and third-line treatment, no second-generation antidepressant was superior to another in terms of effectiveness or of the overall incidence of harmful effects. These findings have permitted payers to construct formulary coverage rules with more confidence and have highlighted the benefits of policies that improve access to care (for example, encouraging primary care treatment of depression) or promote treatment adherence (for example, implementing pay-for-performance initiatives).


Related Article:

November: This Month's Highlights
Psychiatr Serv 2009 60: 1425. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
G. S. Norquist
Introduction to the STAR*D Special Section
Psychiatr Serv, November 1, 2009; 60(11): 1437 - 1438.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2009 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org