Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Articles by Mohamed, S. Articles by Rosenheck, R. A. PubMed Citation Articles by Mohamed, S. Articles by Rosenheck, R. A. Chronically Mentally Ill Patients Rural and Underserved Patients Veterans Access to Services Related Article

VA Intensive Mental Health Case Management in Urban and Rural Areas: Veteran Characteristics and Service Delivery

The authors are affiliated with Veterans Integrated Services Network 1, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 950 Campbell Ave., West Haven, CT 06516 (e-mail: somaia.mohamed{at}yale.edu). They are also with the Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

OBJECTIVE: The availability of mental health services in rural areas—particularly intensive services such as assertive community treatment (ACT)—has been of increasing concern and was the focus of this study. In recent decades the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has developed a national network of ACT-like programs called mental health intensive case management (MHICM), which have served veterans from diverse locations across the country, including urban and rural areas. METHODS: This study used rural-urban commuting area codes and national VA administrative data to compare characteristics of veterans and patterns of MHICM service delivery among veterans with mental illness living in large urban, large rural, small rural, and isolated rural communities. RESULTS: Among veterans enrolled in MHICM from FY 2000 to FY 2005 (N=5,221), 84% (N=4,373) resided in urban areas, 8% (N=421) in large cities, 6% (N=291) in small rural towns, and 3% (N=136) in isolated rural areas. MHICM participants who lived in rural areas had clinical problems broadly similar to those in urban areas, although more rural veterans were unemployed, disabled, received VA disability compensation, and had a payee or fiduciary. MHICM clients in smaller or isolated rural areas received slightly less frequent and less intensive contacts and less recovery-oriented services than those in large urban locations. CONCLUSIONS: These data highlight the need for intensive case management services in rural areas and note some challenges in providing them at the intensity and frequency observed in urban areas where travel distances and times are shorter.

Related Article:

July 2009: This Month's Highlights
Psychiatr Serv 2009 60: 877. [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2009 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us