Psychiatric Services
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Psychiatr Serv 60:1113-1117, August 2009
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.60.8.1113
© 2009 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
* Articles by Ho, J.
* Articles by Coverdale, J. H.
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Ho, J.
* Articles by Coverdale, J. H.
Related Collections
* Other Ethics Issues
* Hospitals, Hospital Treatment
* Violence in Treatment Settings

Open Forum

When Should Psychiatrists Seek Criminal Prosecution of Assaultive Psychiatric Inpatients?

Justin Ho, M.A., D. Christopher Ralston, M.A., Laurence B. McCullough, Ph.D. and John H. Coverdale, M.D., M.Ed.

Mr. Ho and Mr. Ralston are with the Department of Philosophy, Rice University, Houston, Texas. Dr. McCullough and Dr. Coverdale are with the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College, Houston. Dr. Coverdale is also with the Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine. Send correspondence to Dr. Coverdale at the Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, BCM 350, Houston, TX 77030 (e-mail: jhc{at}bcm.tmc.edu)

This Open Forum commentary reviews the ethical considerations relevant to the question of prosecuting assaultive psychiatric patients, with particular attention to the significance that should be attached to the arguments generated by those considerations. A comprehensive literature search was conducted incorporating the terms "assaultive patients," "ethics," "psychiatric inpatients," and "law." The literature of professional medical ethics was applied to identify relevant domains of ethical argument. Five domains were identified: fiduciary obligations of physicians to assaultive and other patients; obligations to staff members; professional virtues of compassion, self-sacrifice, and self-effacement; retributive justice; and the patient's right to confidentiality. The content of each domain is explained, and guidance is provided on how to assess the relative strengths of ethical argument within each domain. All five domains must be explicitly addressed in order to make ethically disciplined judgments about whether to seek prosecution. A distinctive feature of this ethical analysis is the central importance of the professional virtues.







Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2009 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org